![]() Supermarket - Efficiency and Emergency Evacuation (updated 31st August 2007) Keywords: simulating people, simulating crowds, simulating crowd dynamics
Supermarket spatial utilisation analysis. Shows areas of highest utilisation (average use over day). Paraguay supermarket fire kills 283 Mon 2 Aug, 2004 3:14:21 GMT By Daniela Desantis See also - Fire in Madinah Operational Efficiency AND Safety As it can be seen from the tragedy above, the efficiency AND operational safety of places of public assembly are key issues in the world today. Ever more we at Crowd Dynamics see places of public assembly becoming higher risk environments from the threat of international terrorism and lack of concern over the basic requirements for emergency egress (see Crowd Disasters for a horrific list). It is essential that operational efficiency and adherence to acceptable codes of practice are the responsibility of the owner/operators and these responsibilities cannot be ignored. Optimising space is a major feature of the Myriad suite and the models below indicate how comparative analysis of entry systems impact the shopping dynamics and congestion points in the store. The diagram to the left is our suggestion for an improved flow system (different entry/exit routes) and has an increased floor space for merchandise. Furthermore the layout will focus shoppers to the central area. The addition of an extra aisle increases circulation AND reduces congestion/conflict. By this simple change we can facilitate a higher throughput rate and increase merchandise area. We would refer to this process as "crowd simulation". Interaction map of a supermarket Further improvements can be made by analysis of the stock turn and checkout utilisation. Studies at local supermarkets suggest a 30% improvement in space utilisation, higher throughput and less congestion/conflicts.
Existing layout Alternate layout Spatial Utilisation The diagram above (alternate design on the left - exiting on the right) indicates the disproportionate utilisation of the checkout areas. This is exasperated by the location of the "express" checkout in the most utilised area. These express checkout can reduce efficiency of the whole system by up to 10% of the desired throughput and is a non-intuitive result from queuing theory within the Myriad system. This is easily proved but is a persistent feature of all major supermarkets. Not only are they inefficient for the majority of shoppers but their location displaces the throughput to further checkouts. These two effects are subtle but have a dramatic and unperceived result in increasing shopper conflict and congestion. Red areas are high conflict/highest congestion areas.
Existing layout Alternate layout A 3D transform makes the map clearer - the flatter the landscape the more even the shopper distribution around the store (see below). By adding marketing information (Sales of items by area/basket) we can provide a comprehensive analysis and design service.
Existing layout Alternate layout Navigating the space (density/congestion/conflict) is represented as a topography (like a landscape) the more ridges, the more difficult the movement through the space. Flatter landscapes interaction/congestion are one of the desired design criteria for complex spaces. Throughput/conflict analysis One of the key elements to stress free shopping is the ease of progress through the store and ease of access of checkout. There is a financial balance between the number of checkout tills, their location, utilisation and potential for queuing/congestion to impede other shoppers. It is a delicate balancing act that has, at one extreme, idle checkout tellers or severe congestion. Too few checkouts and congestion rapidly creates a shopping trolley gridlock. Too many checkouts reduces merchandising space and increases costs. The location and throughput can be tested in the Myriad system until optimal solutions are found. These vary for time of day and day of the week. However the rapid analysis that Myriad offers means the user can test a wide range of potential solutions very quickly. Numerical data such as throughput, depth of queue, time in the system, space required for different checkout strategies and conflict/congestion analysis are all part of the Myriad suite output analysis. Plotting the interactions Every interaction in a congested environment is a delay and adds to frustrations and general disorder within the shopping dynamics. The Myriad analysis of the above two designs highlights the differences. The two graphs below indicate the number of high congestion interactions encountered by a shopper as they progress along the same route, covering the same distances, shopping for the same items. The first graph is the right hand side design (existing) and the second graph is our modified design. To produce these you use the mouse to "walk" through the store and the graph highlights the levels of service and interactions you may encounter. The axes of these graphs are interactions/collisions versus travel distance. The higher the number of interactions (redder peaks), the slower the progress and more uncomfortable the shopping experience. Graph 1 - Existing layout
We can see the differences immediately, less interaction, less congestion, easier transition across the shopping area. You read these maps like you would read an OS map if you were out hill climbing, the more peaks - the tougher the journey. Flatter landscapes are approaching optimal, even density, minimum congestion, minimum effort, greater throughput.
Contact us for further information. |